How do I respond to reviewer 2?

How do I respond to reviewer 2?

Thank the reviewers for their efforts. Be polite and respectful, even if you think a review is not particularly constructive. But don’t be afraid to disagree with reviewers. Sometimes reviewers ask you to do things that you don’t think are valid or wise, and it’s important to defend your work.

Why is reviewer 2 mean?

Literally, Reviewer 2 is the anonymised moniker given to the second peer to review a research paper. In common parlance, Reviewer 2 can be summarised as possessing the following qualities: Grumpy. Unwilling to view the authors of a submitted paper as peers.

What do you understand by the term peer review?

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work (peers). It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field.

How do you reply to a review?

How to Respond to Positive Reviews

1. Thank the Reviewer. The reviewer just said something nice about your company—it would be poor manners if you didn’t thank them!
2. Respond Quickly To Positive Reviews.
3. Keep It Short.
4. Be Authentic and Personal.
5. Invite Them To Take Action.
6. Share The Positive Review.

What is a second reviewer?

Essentially the second reviewer assesses the same studies identified as the first reviewer, simultaneously and independently to them. They should be using the same data extraction tool and they keep a record of the studies they rejected/ included and the reasons why.

How do you comment on peer writing?

Starts here4:51How to Write Effective Peer Review Comments – YouTubeYouTube

What is blind peer reviewing?

Peer review of academic research is at the heart of publishing. In single-blind peer review, the authors do not know who the reviewers are. The reviewers know who the authors are. In double-blind peer review, neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s names. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model.

How do you become a peer reviewer?

Become a Reviewer

1. Asking a colleague who already reviews for a journal to recommend you.
2. Networking with editors at professional conferences.
3. Becoming a member of a learned society and then networking with other members in your area.
4. Contacting journals directly to inquire if they are seeking new reviewers.

What are minor revisions?

Minor revision means that your paper accepted by about 70 % but not final acceptance until you fix further comments. Time varies from journal to others, but within one month.

Are major revisions bad?

Not too bad. So, what does a journal’s editorial decision of “major revisions” mean? In short, “major revisions” means you’ve got work to do on your manuscript, but you’re still very much in the game. Your target journal’s editor has sent your manuscript to two or more peer reviewers.

How do I respond to reviewer comments?

Rule 7: Whenever possible, begin your response to each comment with a direct answer to the point being raised. You can provide background information, but you should do so after giving your primary response. Provide a “yes” or “no” answer whenever possible. When the reviewer is correct, state so in your response.